Reliability and reproducibility of computed tomography-based facet joint measurements in patients with AO spine type A2, A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures: protocol for the REFACT study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20263757Keywords:
Facet joint, Pathria classification, Computed tomography, Interobserver agreement, Intraobserver agreement, Thoracolumbar spine, Joint-space width, Facet joint angleAbstract
Background: Computed tomography (CT) is widely used to assess facet joint (FJ) degeneration. However, previous studies have reported inconsistent interobserver agreement for the Pathria classification, while the reproducibility of quantitative FJ measurements remains insufficiently investigated. The REFACT study aims to evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of CT-based FJ assessment in patients with AO spine type A2, A3, and A4 thoracolumbar fractures.
Methods: REFACT is a single center, multiobserver reliability study using retrospectively collected, anonymized CT datasets. Six independent raters (three neurosurgeons and three radiologists) will assess at least 142 evaluable FJs using a standardized protocol. Assessments will include Pathria grading, mean FJ-space width, and FJ angle measurements. Each rater will perform two assessment rounds with randomized case order and a one-month washout interval. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability will be evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) for continuous measurements and Fleiss’ kappa or weighted kappa coefficients for ordinal grading, with 95% confidence intervals. Exploratory analyses will assess agreement by specialty, vertebral level, and side. Patient-level clustered bootstrap analyses will account for within-patient correlation.
Conclusions: The REFACT study will establish the reproducibility of CT-based FJ grading and morphometric measurements, identify potential limitations of the standardized assessment protocol, and provide a methodological basis for subsequent longitudinal studies of FJ degeneration following thoracolumbar fractures.
Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT07670039.
References
Cho SK, Riew KD. Adjacent segment disease following cervical spine surgery. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2013;21(1):3-11.
Saavedra-Pozo FM, Deusdara RA, Benzel EC. Adjacent segment disease perspective and review of the literature. Ochsner J. 2014;14(1):78-83.
Pathria M, Sartoris DJ, Resnick D. Osteoarthritis of the facet joints: accuracy of oblique radiographic assessment. Radiology. 1987;164(1):227-30.
Kalichman L, Suri P, Guermazi A, Ling L, David JH. Facet orientation and tropism: associations with facet joint osteoarthritis and degeneratives. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(16):E579-85.
Tiwari P, Kaur H, Jha V. Is thoracic facet joint arthritis over-reported? It’s time to review CT grading parameters-an analytical cross-sectional study. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2020;30(4):427-35.
Coste J, Judet O, Barre O, Siaud JR, Cohen de Lara A, Paolaggi JB. Inter- and intraobserver variability in the interpretation of computed tomography of the lumbar spine. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(4):375-81.
Berg L, Thoresen H, Neckelmann G, Håvard F, Christian H, Ansgar E. Facet arthropathy evaluation: CT or MRI? Eur Radiol. 2019;29(9):4990-8.
Stieber J, Quirno M, Cunningham M, Thomas JE, John AB. The reliability of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging grading of lumbar facet arthropathy in total disc replacement patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009;34(23):E833-40.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-74.
Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63.
Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, Allan D, Byron JG, Asbjørn H, et al. Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(1):96-106.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andrey Grin, Aleksandr Talypov, Anton Kordonskiy, Vasiliy Karanadze, Ivan Lvov, Mikhail Kucherov, Rinat Abdrafiev, Aleksandr Tupikin, Layla Khamidova, Roman Elokhovskiy, Ksenia Dmitrenko, Maria Nanoyan, Olga Minkina

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.