Comparative evaluation of caries removal using smart bur and ceramic bur in pediatric patients: an in vivo study

Muhammad Vajid C.; Dhanya K. B.; Ambili Ayilliath; Mridhul M. U.

doi:10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20263754

Authors

Muhammad Vajid C. Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Mahe Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Chalakkara, Palloor, Mahe, Puducherry, India
Dhanya K. B. Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Mahe Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Chalakkara, Palloor, Mahe, Puducherry, India
Ambili Ayilliath Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Mahe Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Chalakkara, Palloor, Mahe, Puducherry, India
Mridhul M. U. Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Mahe Institute of Dental Science and Hospital, Chalakkara, Palloor, Mahe, Puducherry, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20263754

Keywords:

Smart bur, Ceramic bur, Pediatric dentistry, Minimally invasive dentistry, Caries removal, FLACC scale

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive caries removal is a key principle in pediatric dentistry that preserves healthy tooth structure, maintains pulp vitality, and enhances patient comfort. Smart burs (polymer burs) and ceramic burs are conservative excavation systems designed for selective removal of infected dentin. This study compared the efficiency, efficacy, and patient comfort associated with these two minimally invasive caries removal techniques in children.

Methods: An in vivo randomized split-mouth clinical trial was conducted among 26 healthy children aged 6-12 years. Two carious primary mandibular molars in each participant were randomly assigned to smart bur and ceramic bur groups. Following topical anesthesia and rubber dam isolation, caries excavation was performed using the allocated bur. Efficiency was assessed by excavation time, efficacy by visual, tactile, and caries-detecting dye assessments, and patient discomfort using the face, legs, activity, cry, and consolability (FLACC) scale.

Results: Ceramic burs demonstrated significantly greater efficiency (2.72±0.26 versus 3.54±0.53 min; p<0.0001) and superior caries removal efficacy (0.88±0.33 versus 1.92±0.27; p<0.0001). Smart burs caused no significant increase in FLACC scores (p=0.5), whereas ceramic burs significantly increased patient discomfort (p<0.0001).

Conclusions: Both systems were effective for minimally invasive caries removal. Ceramic burs provided superior efficiency and efficacy, while smart burs offered greater patient comfort, making them a valuable option for pediatric minimally invasive caries management.

References

Pitts NB, Zero DT, Marsh PD, Ekstrand K, Weintraub JA, Ramos-Gomez F, et al. Dental caries. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3(1):17030.

Tinanoff N, Baez RJ, Diaz Guillory C, Donly KJ, Feldens CA, McGrath C, et al. Early childhood caries epidemiology, aetiology, risk assessment, societal burden, management, education, and policy: Global perspective. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2019;29(3):238-48.

Chowdhary N, Kiran N, Peddi R. Clinical evaluation of caries removal efficacy of polymer burs. Int J Innov Sci Res Tech. 2022;7(1):777-84.

Schwendicke F, Stolpe M, Meyer-Lueckel H, Paris S, Dörfer CE. Cost-effectiveness of one-and two-step incomplete and complete excavations. J Dent Res. 2013;92(10):880-7.

Innes NP, Frencken JE, Bjørndal L, Maltz M, Manton DJ, Ricketts D, et al. Managing Carious Lesions: Consensus Recommendations on Terminology. Adv Dent Res. 2016;28(2):49-57.

Mehrotra D, Kodical SR, Naik SS. Comparison of smart burs and chemo-mechanical caries removal systems in primary molars-A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2024;42(4):257-66.

Chavhan PD, Khole MD, Shah SS, Chandak SA, Patil GR, Mujariya PP, et al. Comparative Efficacy of Smart Burs vs Conventional Burs in Removing Infected Dentin and Preserving Affected Dentin in Primary Teeth: A Randomised Control Study. JCDR. 2024;18(10):ZC81-9.

Wahba W, Sharaf A, Bakery N, Nagui D. Evaluation of polymer bur for carious dentin removal in primary teeth. Alex Dent J. 2015;40(1):107-12.

Faiek A, Mostafa M, Al-Bauomy S. Clinical and Microbiological Evaluation of Smartprep Burs in Caries Removal in Primary Teeth. Al-Azhar J Dent. 2000;2023(2).

Inamdar MS, Chole DG, Bakle SS, Gandhi NP, Hatte NR, Rao MP. Comparative evaluation of BRIX3000, carie care, and smart burs in caries excavation: An: in vivo: study. J Conserv Dent Endod. 2020;23(2):163-8.

Krishnaveni L, Dash JK, Baliarsingh RR, Ray P, Khwairakpam M, Das S. Comparative Evaluation of Caries Removal Efficacy of Ceramic Bur, Polymer Smart Bur, and Conventional Tungsten Carbide Bur in Primary Molars: A Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2025;18(10):1222-7.

Kini A, Kothari P, Sujith R, Shetty N, Varughese BK, Kasargod SC. Comparative evaluation of clinical and microbiological assessment of caries excavation using conventional, smart bur, chemomechanical method and ErCr: YSGG laser. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024;16(3):S2830-2.

Goyal A, Srivastava M, Khanduja R, Bharti K. Comparative evaluation of efficiency, efficacy, and patient perception of caries excavation burs in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. J South Asian Assoc Pediatr Dent. 2022;5(1):11-6.

Shivasharan PR, Farhin AK, Wakpanjar MM, Shetty A. Clinical evaluation of caries removal in primary teeth using carie-care and SmartPrep burs: An in vivo study. Indian J Oral Health Res. 2016;2(1):27-31.

Vishwanathaiah S, Maganur PC, Maafa SM, Tulays AM, Hakami MM, Albar NH, et al. Assessing Caries Removal Efficacy and Pain Perception in Children, Using Smart Bur Versus Carbide Bur: A Randomized Clinical Study. Medical science monitor. Med Sci Monit. 2025;31:e946802.

El-Baz G. Comparative study between SmartBurs II and conventional carbide burs in the evaluation of pain and anxiety in children. Dent Sci Update. 2024;5(1):197-203.

Khoury N, Laflouf M, Rikab MS, AlKurdi S, AlNerabieh Z, Alkhouli M. Efficacy of Smart burs and CARISOLV in caries removal in comparison to conventional method: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. JDSIR. 2022;45(4):22-9.

Abdul-Kareem Mahmood M, Khairi Al-Hadithi H, Mueen Hussein H. Evaluation of dentin features in teeth after caries removal by three techniques (chemomechanical, mechanical with a smart bur, and air-abrasion): an in vitro study. Peer J. 2024;12:e17717.

Somani R, Chaudhary R, Jaidka S, Singh DJ. Comparative microbiological evaluation after caries removal by various burs. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2019;12(6):524.

Goyal A, Srivastava M, Khanduja R, Bharti K. Comparative evaluation of efficiency, efficacy, and patient perception of caries excavation burs in pediatric patients: a randomized clinical trial. JSAAPD. 2018;5(1):11-6.

Soorya AM, Chamarthi VR, Santhosh Priya AK, Dhanraj Kalaivanan DS, Saleem S. To compare the efficiency, efficacy, and pain perception with ceramic bur, diamond bur and hand excavation. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2024;10(2):180-4.

Banerjee A, Sherriff M, Kidd EA, Watson TF. A confocal microscopic study relating the autofluorescence of carious dentine to its microhardnes. Br Dent J. 1999;187(4):206-10.

Banerjee A, Frencken JE, Schwendicke F, Innes NP. Contemporary operative caries management: consensus recommendations on minimally invasive caries removal. Br Dent J. 2017;223(3):215-22.

Lim ZE, Duncan HF, Moorthy A, McReynolds D. Minimally invasive selective caries removal: a clinical guide. Br Dent J. 2023;234(4):233-40.

Bjørndal L, Larsen T, Thylstrup A. A clinical and microbiological study of deep carious lesions during stepwise excavation using long treatment intervals. Caries Res. 1997;31(6):411-7.

Bjørndal L, Reit C, Bruun G, Markvart M, Kjaeldgaard M, Näsman P, et al. Treatment of deep caries lesions in adults: randomized clinical trials comparing stepwise vs. direct complete excavation, and direct pulp capping vs. partial pulpotomy. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118(3):290-7.

Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, Dorigo ED. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Materials. 2008;24(1):90-101.

Carrilho MR, Geraldeli S, Tay F, De Goes MF, Carvalho RM, Tjäderhane L, et al. In vivo preservation of the hybrid layer by chlorhexidine. J Dent Res. 2007;86(6):529-33.

Celiberti P, Francescut P, Lussi A. Performance of four dentine excavation methods in deciduous teeth. Caries Res. 2006;40(2):117-23.

Maltz M, Henz SL, de Oliveira EF, Jardim JJ. Conventional caries removal and sealed caries in permanent teeth: a microbiological evaluation. J Dent. 2012;40(9):776-82.