Consumer involvement in cancer clinical trials: an Australian experience

Authors

  • Elizabeth J. Paton Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney, Australia
  • Anthony G. Shannon Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney, Australia; University of Notre Dame Australia, School of Education, Broadway, Australia; Australian Institute of Technology and Commerce, Haymarket, Australia
  • Gerald B. Fogarty Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, Sydney, Australia; University of Notre Dame Australia, School of Education, Broadway, Australia; University of Notre Dame Australia, Faculty of Medicine, Darlinghurst, Australia; Icon Cancer Centre, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Wahroonga, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20261377

Keywords:

Evidence-based medicine, Implementation research, Oncology, Consumer advocacy, Australia

Abstract

Background: Healthcare consumer involvement in clinical research is considered best practice, however its relationship to trial success is ambiguous. There is limited Australian evidence. This study seeks to examine whether consumer involvement is associated with trial success in the Australian Cancer Clinical Research Network (CRN) landscape, with a skin cancer focus.

Methods: Drawing on the theories of evidence-based medicine and implementation research, published data was studied to characterize cancer research consumer involvement, in particular skin cancer. Mature data from skin cancer trials with the same Australian sponsor was studied to identify, define and evaluate specific consumer initiatives for an association with trials that completed. Trial success was measured by sufficient recruitment that was adequate to answer the research question. Data were extracted and tabulated (grouped, deidentified). Using descriptive statistics, a multi-disciplinary expert team synthesized and interpreted the data.

Results: All Australian cancer CRNs demonstrated integrated consumer involvement in their organizational governance and trial operations. During 2008-2020, 56 studies were screened; six studies met the criteria. Four consumer initiatives were described (consumer expertise, trial promotion, trial access, patient safety; with examples). The only metric associated with success was the degree of trial access. Only 2/6 selected studies achieved target accrual. There are several study limitations.

Conclusions: Australian CRNs demonstrated integrated consumer involvement that meets the best-practice policies and standards. Trial accrual is challenging including in Australian skin cancer research. Specific consumer initiatives have been identified and described to support trial sponsor governance and trials operations. Future research is warranted.

References

World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2013. Available at: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Integrated addendum to ICH E6(R1): guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2). 2016. Available at: https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E6_R2_Addendum.pdf. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation. What is lived experience? U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2021. Available at: https://aspe.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ documents/d111ec032c54d2a01e5209a792f99629/What-is-lived-experience.pdf. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

National Health and Medical Research Council. National statement on ethical conduct in human research. 2023. Available at: https://www.nhmrc. gov.au/about-us/publications/national-statement-ethical-conduct-human-research-2023. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Crocker JC, Ricci-Cabello I, Parker A, Fatima F, Castaldo M, Rees S. Impact of patient and public involvement on enrolment and retention in clinical trials: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2018;363:k4738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k4738

Staley K. “Is it worth doing?” Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research. Res Involv Engagem. 2015;1:6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-015-0008-5

Staniszewska S, Adebajo A, Barber R, Beresford P, Brady LM, Brett J, et al. Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: the case for measuring impact. Int J Consum Stud. 2011;35(6):628-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01020.x

Getz KA. Establishing return-on-investment expectations for patient-centric initiatives. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2015;49(5):745-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479015579521

Symons T, Bowden J, McKenzie A, Fallon-Ferguson JM, Weekes LY, Ansell J, et al. Development of the Consumer Involvement & Engagement Toolkit: a digital resource to build capacity for undertaking patient-centred clinical trials in Australia. Public Health Res Pract. 2023;33(1):32122209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp32122209

McKenzie A, Bowden J, Zalcberg JR, Conroy K, Fallon-Ferguson J, Jesudason S, et al. A snapshot of consumer engagement in clinical trials in Australia: results of a national survey of clinical trial networks and research organisations. Res Involv Engagem. 2022;8:3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00338-w

Vincent CA, Coulter A. Patient safety: what about the patient? Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11(1):76-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.11.1.76

Dear RF, Barratt AL, Crossing S, Butow PN, Hanson S, McGeechan K, et al. Consumer input into research: the Australian Cancer Trials website. Health Res Policy Syst. 2011;9:30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-9-30

Ashkenazy R, Schneider RF. A patient centricity team tool to enable patient-focused drug development. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2016;50(5):577-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479016640563

Mick DG. Meaning and mattering through transformative consumer research. Adv Consum Res. 2006;33:1-4.

Milley K, Chima S, McIntosh JG, Ackland E, Rankin N, Butow P, et al. Long-term consumer involvement in cancer research: working towards partnership. Health Expect. 2021;24(4):1263-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13258

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Skin cancer in Australia. (Cat. no. CAN 96). 2016. Available at: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/ cancer/skin-cancer-in-australia/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Olsen CM, Pandeya N, Green AC, Ragaini BS, Venn AJ, Whiteman DC. Keratinocyte cancer incidence in Australia: a review of population-based incidence trends and estimates of lifetime risk. Public Health Res Pract. 2022;32(1):e3212203. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17061/phrp3212203

The joint ACTA/ACSQHC Working Group. The value proposition of investigator-initiated clinical trials conducted by networks. Med J Aust. 2021;214(4):189-92. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50935

Australian Clinical Trials Alliance. ACTA clinical trials networks report 2004–2014. 2019. Available at: https://clinicaltrialsalliance.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/ACTA_Networks_Report_2004-14_online.pdf. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Askie LM, Hunter KE, Berber S, et al. The clinical trials landscape in Australia 2006–2015. Sydney: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. 2017. Available at: https://www.anzctr.org. au/docs/ClinicalTrialsInAustralia2006-2015.pdf. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

MTPConnect. Australia’s clinical trials sector. 2021. Available at: https://www.mtpconnect.org.au/ images/MTPConnect_2021_AustraliasClinicalTrialsSectorReport.pdf. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Cancer Australia, Cancer Voices Australia. National framework for consumer involvement in cancer control. 2011. Available at: https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/sites/default/files/migrated-files/publications/national_consumer_framework_web_504af020f2184.pdf. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Paton EJ, Luckett T, Fogarty GB, Shannon AG, Debono D, Calvert J, et al. Factors influencing the performance of clinical research networks to improve the success of cancer clinical trials: a scoping review and organisational analysis. J Clin Transl Sci. 2026;10(1):e9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10210

Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. OCEBM levels of evidence. 2025. Available at: https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/levels-of-evidence/ocebm-levels-of-evidence. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Rogers W, Hutchison K. Evidence-based medicine in theory and practice: epistemological and normative issues. In: Schramme T, Edwards S, editors. Handbook of the philosophy of medicine. Dordrecht: Springer; 2017. p. 851-872. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8688-1_52. Accessed on 10 January 2026. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8688-1_40

Stensland KD, Sales AE, Damschroder LJ, Skolarus TA. Applying implementation frameworks to the clinical trial context. Implement Sci Commun. 2022;3(1):109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00355-6

Australian and New Zealand Children’s Haematology and Oncology Group. About ANZCHOG. 2025. Available at: https://anzchog.org/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Australia and New Zealand Gynaecological Oncology Group. About ANZGOG. 2025. Available at: https://www.anzgog.org.au/about/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Australian and New Zealand Urogenital and Prostate Cancer Trials Group. About ANZUP. 2025. Available at: https://anzup.org.au. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Australasian Sarcoma Trials Group. Organisation and consumer advisory structures. 2025. Available at: https://sarcoma.org.au/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

GI Cancer Institute. About us and consumer engagement. 2025. Available at: https://gicancer. org.au/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Australasian Leukaemia and Lymphoma Group. About ALLG. 2025. Available at: https://www.allg. org.au/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Breast Cancer Trials. Organisation and consumer advisory panel. 2025. Available at: https://www.breastcancertrials.org.au/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Cancer Symptom Trials. Cancer Symptom Trials program and governance. 2025. Available at: https://www.uts.edu.au/research/impacct/cancer-sympt-trials. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Co-operative Trials Group for Neuro-Oncology. Members and committees. 2025. Available at: https://cogno.org.au/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Melanoma and Skin Cancer Trials. Organisation information and trial activity. 2025. Available at: https://www.masc.org.au/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group. About us and consumer information. 2025. Available at: http://pc4tg.com.au/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Psycho-Oncology Cooperative Research Group. About PoCoG and community advisory group. 2025. Available at: https://www.pocog.org.au/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Thoracic Oncology Group Australasia. About TOGA. 2025. Available at: https://thoraciconcology.org.au/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group. Research reports and governance. 2025. Available at: https://www.trog.com.au/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Australian Securities and Investments Commission. ASIC company search. 2025. Available at: https://connectonline.asic.gov.au/RegistrySearch/faces/landing/bn/SearchBnRegisters.jspx. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. ANZCTR. 2025. Available at: https://www.anzctr. org.au/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

U.S. National Library of Medicine. ClinicalTrials.gov. 2025. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Waterhouse DM, Harvey RD, Hurley P, Levit LA, Kim ES, Klepin HD, et al. Early impact of COVID-19 on the conduct of oncology clinical trials and long-term opportunities for transformation: findings from an American Society of Clinical Oncology survey. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020;16(7):417-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/OP.20.00275

Siminoff LA, Zhang A, Colabianchi N, Sturm CM, Shen Q. Factors that predict the referral of breast cancer patients onto clinical trials by their surgeons and medical oncologists. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(6):1203-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2000.18.6.1203

Cancer Australia. Australian Cancer Trials. 2025. Available at: https://www.australiancancertrials. gov.au/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

ClinTrial Refer. ClinTrial Refer. 2025. Available at: https://www.clintrialrefer.org.au/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Defining the role of authors and contributors. 2024. Available at: https://www.icmje.org/ recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

National Health and Medical Research Council. Funding schemes and consumer and community involvement. 2025. Available at: https://www. nhmrc.gov.au/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Cancer Australia. Consumers and grant review committees; grants and funding. 2025. Available at: https://www.canceraustralia.gov.au/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Cancer Council NSW. Project grant applications. 2025. Available at: https://www.cancercouncil. com.au/research/for-researchers/project-grant-applications/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Levitan B, Getz K, Eisenstein EL, Goldberg M, Harker M, Hesterlee SE, et al. Assessing the financial value of patient engagement: a quantitative approach from CTTI's patient groups and clinical trials project. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018;52(2):220-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2168479017716715

Le-Rademacher J, Mohile S, Unger JM, Hudson MF, Foster J, Lichtman S, et al. Trial design considerations to increase older adult accrual to National Cancer Institute clinical trials. JNCI Monogr. 2022;2022(60):135-41. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgac023

Lichtman SM, Harvey RD, Damiette Smit MA, Rahman A, Thompson MA, Roach N, et al. Modernizing clinical trial eligibility criteria: recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology–Friends of Cancer Research organ dysfunction, prior or concurrent malignancy, and comorbidities working group. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(33):3753-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.74.4102

Lee EQ, Chukwueke UN, Hervey-Jumper SL, de Groot JF, Butowski NA. Barriers to accrual and enrollment in brain tumor trials. Neuro Oncol. 2019;21(9):1100-17.

National Health and Medical Research Council. Statement on consumer and community involvement in health and medical research. 2016. Available at: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/about-us/publications/ statement-consumer-and-community-involvement-health-and-medical-research. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Patient Voice Initiative. Patient Voice Initiative. 2025. Available at: https://www.patientvoiceinitiative.org/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Fogarty G, Paton E, Allen J, Calvert J. Towards better outcomes for Australians with keratinocyte skin cancers – time for patients to speak up? J Cancer Prev Curr Res. 2021;12(5):159-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/jcpcr.2021.12.00472

Dewar B. Beyond tokenistic involvement of older people in research: a framework for future development and understanding. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14(Suppl 1):48-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01162.x

Australian Clinical Trials Alliance. Preparing a budget for consumer involvement. 2025. Available at: https://involvementtoolkit.clinicaltrialsalliance. org.au/toolkit/planning/preparing-a-budget/. Accessed on 10 January 2026.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-29

How to Cite

Paton, E. J., Shannon, A. G., & Fogarty, G. B. (2026). Consumer involvement in cancer clinical trials: an Australian experience. International Journal of Clinical Trials, 13(2), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20261377

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles