Colposcopic evaluation of cervical lesions: a prospective study


  • Vineeta Gupta Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Shri Guru Ram Rai Institute of Medical and Health Sciences, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
  • Archna Tandon
  • Anuja Nanda
  • Arti Sharma
  • Neeta Bansal



Colposcopy, Cervical lesions


Background: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the role of colposcopy as a screening and diagnostic tool for cervical cancer and other cervical lesions in high risk women.

Methods: All the women included in the study were subjected to colposcopic examination. Colposcopic findings were compared with cytology and histopathological examination. Accuracy of colposcopic examination was calculated by standard statistical methods. Sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Valve (PPV) and Negative Predictive Valve (NPV) of colposcopic examination was calculated.

Results: Three hundred patients underwent colposcopic examination. The overall sensitivity and specificity of colposcopy was 85.85% and 87.65% respectively. Positive predictive value was 75.83% and negative predictive value was 95.38%. The percentage of false negative as well as that of false positive was calculated to be 13.74%. The accuracy of colposcopy was found to be more for high grade lesions as composed to low grade lesions.

Conclusions: Colposcopy gives immediate and accurate results and its value as diagnostic modality is undisputed. It should also be considered as a primary screening test for high risk women living in remote areas where women cannot visit the doctor repeatedly as the ideal screening triage cannot be implemented in such situations.


Parham GP, Andrews NR, Loe ML. Comparison of immediate and deferred colposcopy in a cervical screening programme. Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;95:340-4.

Syrjanen K, Naud P, Derchain S, Roteli-Martins C, Longatto-Filho A, Tatti S, et al. Comparing Pap smear cytology, aided visual inspection, screening colposcopy, cervicography and HCV testing as optional screening tools in Latin America. Study design and baseline data of the LAMS study. Anticancer Res. 2005;25:3469-80.

Arora R, Vijaya K, Habbeebullah S, Umachigui AO. Colposcopic evaluation of unhealthy cervix. J Obstet Gynaecol of India. 2000;50:102-3.

Sundari N. Prevalence of CIN in urban population: role of screening colposcopy. Asian J Obstet Gynaecol Pract. 2000;4(2):16-9.

Farideh D. Nahid A. A comparative study on colposcopy directed biopsy and Pap smear tests in patients with an abnormal Pap smear. Iranian J Pathol. 2006;1:13-6.

Sufang Wu, Li Merg, Shi Xuan Wang, Ding Ma. A comparison of four screening methods for cervical neoplasia. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005;91:189-93.

Maria A, Eleni K, Ekatherina C, Dimitirs A, Dimitris H, Christos Y. Comparison of cytology, colposcopy. HPV typing and biomarker analysis in cervical neoplasia. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(8):3401-9.

Paul M. Norris, Leo B. Twiggs. Colposcopic grading of cervical intraepithetial neoplasia. Trends Cervical Health. 2010;7:1-2.

Nelson GS, Duggan MA, Nation JG. Controversy in colposcopic management: a Canadian survey. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2006;28(1):36-40.






Original Research Articles