The effectiveness of video feedback intervention on mother-infant interactional quality for women with perinatal mental health illnesses: protocol for a pilot randomised control trial

Authors

  • Rachel Buhagiar Department of Psychology, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2020, Malta
  • Kristina Bettenzana Department of Psychology, University of Malta, Msida, MSD 2020, Malta
  • Jane Barlow Department of Social Policy and Intervention, University of Oxford, England

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20242002

Keywords:

VF, Perinatal mental health, Mother-baby relationship, Dyadic synchrony, Parental sensitivity

Abstract

Background: The literature strongly suggests that early parent-child relational interventions for at-risk dyads can support healthy infant development and attachment security. Video Feedback (VF) is a widely used attachment-based intervention, but evidence for its effectiveness with mother-baby dyads where there is maternal psychopathology remains limited.

Methods: This study constitutes a two-armed pilot randomised controlled trial aimed at evaluating the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary benefits of Video Interaction Guidance (VIG), a type of VF, on mother-child dyadic interactional quality for postpartum women and their infants in Malta. Participants must be mothers with a baby aged 0-12 months who meet criteria for one or more mental health disorders on diagnostic interview. Exclusions are severe maternal mental illness, active drug dependence, being in receipt of in-patient care or therapy, or inability to speak English or Maltese. Consenting, eligible mothers are randomly allocated (minimised by infant age, relationship and employment status, and number of children at home), to either 3 cycles of one-to-one VIG intervention and treatment-as-usual (TAU), or to TAU only. Outcome assessors are blind to study arm allocation. The primary outcomes are parental sensitivity and dyadic synchrony coded using the CARE-index. Secondary outcomes are maternal depression and anxiety, bonding experience, capacity for reflective functioning, and well-being.

Conclusions: This is the first study on the preliminary effectiveness of VIG within perinatal services in Malta. Findings should guide future larger scale, definitive RCTs and subsequently inform health policy and management decisions in perinatal and infant mental health care. 

Trial registration: Registered 16th March 2023 in ISRCTN registry (Trial ID: ISRCTN26320951).

References

Woody CA, Ferrari AJ, Siskind DJ, Whiteford HA, Harris MG. A systematic review and meta-regression of the prevalence and incidence of perinatal depression. J Affect Disord. 2017;219:86-92.

Goodman JH, Watson GR, Stubbs B. Anxiety disorders in postpartum women: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2016;203:292-331.

Gupta S, Ford-Jones E. Recognising and responding to parental mental health needs: what can we do now? J Paediatr Child Health. 2014;19(7):357-361.

Stein A, Pearson RM, Goodman SH, Rapa E, Rahman A, McCallum M, et al. Effects of perinatal mental health disorders on the fetus and child. The Lancet. 2014;384:1800-20.

Rados SN. Parental sensitivity and responsiveness as mediators between postpartum mental health and bonding in mothers and fathers. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12:723418.

Rogers A, Shelley O, Teague SJ, Rossen L, Spry EA, Macdonald JA, et al. Association between maternal perinatal depression and anxiety and child and adolescent development: a meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(11):1082-92.

O’Leary N, Jairaj C, Molloy EJ, McAuliffe FM, Nixon E, O’Keane V. Antenatal depression and the impact on infant cognitive, language and motor development at six and twelve months postpartum. Early Hum Dev. 2019;134:41-6.

Steele E, McKinney C. Emerging adult psychological problems and parenting style: Moderation by parent-child relationship quality. Pers Individ Differ. 2019;146:201-8.

Aktar E, Qu J, Lawrence PJ, Tollenaar MS, Elzinga BM, Bogels SM F, et al. Infant outcomes in the offspring of parents with perinatal mental disorders: earliest influences. Front Psychiaty. 2019;10:391.

Dib EP, Padovani EHP, Perosa GB. Mother-child interaction: implications of chronic maternal anxiety and depression. Psicol Reflexao Critica. 2019;32:10.

Ainsworth MDS, Blehar MC, Waters E, Wall S. Patterms of attachment: a psychological study of the Strange Situation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale N J. 1978.

De Wolff M, van Ijzendoorn NH. Sensitivity and attachment: a meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachment. Child Dev. 2006;68(4):571-91.

Muzik M, Marcus SM, Flynn HA. Psychotherapeutic treatment options for perinatal depression: emphasis on maternal-infant dyadic outcomes. J Clin Psychiatr. 2009;70(9):1318-9.

Judd F, Newman LK, Komiti AA. Time for a new zeitgeist in perinatal mental health. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2018;52(2):112-6.

Woltering S, Lishak V, Elliott B, Ferraro L, Granic I. Dyadic attunement and physiological synchrony during mother-child interactions: An exploratory study in children with and without externalizing behaviour problems. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2015;37:624-33.

Harrist AW, Waugh RM. Dyadic synchrony: Its structure and function in children’s development. Dev Rev. 2002;22(4):555-92.

Leclere C, Viaux S, Avril M, Achard C, Chetouani M, Missonnier S, et al. Why synchrony matters during mother-child interactions: a systematic review. Plos One. 2014;9(12):e113571.

DePasquale C. A systematic review of caregiver-child physiological synchrony across systems: associations with behaviour and child functioning. Dev Psychopathol. 2020:32(5):1754-77.

Kennedy H, Landor M, Todd L. Video Interaction Guidance as a method to promote secure attachment. Educ Child Psychol. 2010;27(3):59-72.

Kennedy H, Ball K, Barlow J. How does video interaction guidance contribute to infant and parental mental health and well-being? Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;22(3):500-7.

Poslawsky IE, Naber FB, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, De Jonge MV, Van Engeland H, Van IJzendoom MH. Development of a video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting for children with autism (VIPP-AUTI). Attach Hum Dev. 2014;16(4):343-55.

Lam-Cassettari C, Wadnerkar-Kamble MB, James DM. Enhancing parent-child communication and parental self-esteem with a video-feedback intervention: outcomes with prelingual deaf and hard-of-hearing children. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015;20(3):266-7.

Tooten A, Hoffenkamp HN, Hall RAS, Winkel FW, Eliens M, Vingerhoets AJJM, et al. The effectiveness of video interaction guidance in parents of premature infants: a multi-center randomised controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. 2012;12(76):1-9.

O’Hara L, Smith ER, Barlow J, Livingstone N, Nerath NINS, Wei Y, et al. Video feedback for parental sensitivity and attachment security in children under five years (review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;11:CD012348.

National Statistics Office (NSO). Regional statistics-Malta, 2021 edition, 2021. Available at: https://nso.gov.mt/en/nso/Media/Salient-Points-of-Publications/Documents/2021/Regional%202021/Regional%20Statistics%202021_full%20publication.pdf. Accessed on 20 March 2024.

Directorate of Health Information and Research, Ministry for Health (Malta). Malta National Obstetric Information System Annual Report 2018, 2019. Available at: https://ghdx.healthdata.org/record/malta-national-obstetric-information-system-annual-report-2018. Accessed on 20 March 2024.

First MB, Williams JBW, Karg RS, Spitzer RL. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5-Research Version (SCID-5 for DSM-5, Research Version; SCID-5-RV). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association;2015

First MB, Williams JBW, Benjamin LS, Spitzer RL. User’s Guide for the SCID-5-PD (Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorder). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association. 2015.

Osório FL, Loureiro SR, Hallak JEC, Machado-de-Sousa, JP, Ushirohira JM, Baes, CVW, et al. Clinical validity and intrarater and test-retest reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5-Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV). Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2019;73:754-60.

Crittenden PM. Using the CARE-Index for screening, intervention, and research. Special issue: Bindungsorientierte Ansätze in der Praxis der Frühförderung. 2005;24:S99-106.

Tryphonopoulos PD, Letourneau N, Ditommaso E. Attachment and caregiver-infant interaction: a review of observational-assessment tools. Infant Ment Health J. 2014;35(6):642-56.

Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150(6):782-6.

Cox J. Use and misuse of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS): a ten point ‘survival analysis’. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2017;20:789-90.

Levis B, Negeri Z, Sun Y, Benedetti A, Thombs BD. Accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening to detect major depression among pregnant and postpartum women: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ. 2020;371:m4022.

Simpson W, Glazer M, Michalski N, Steiner M, Frey BN. Comparative efficacy of the generalised anxiety disorder 7-item scale and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale as screening tools for generalized anxiety disorder in preganncy and the postpartum period. Can J Psychiatry. 2014;59(8):434-40.

Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalised anxiety disorder. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:1092-7.

Brockington IF, Oates J, George S, Turner D, Vostanis P, Sullivan M, et al. A screening questionnaire for mother-infant bonding disorders. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2001;3:133-40.

Brockington IF, Fraser C, Wilson D. The Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire: a validation. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2006;9:233-42.

Wittkowski A, Wieck A, Mann S. An evaluation of two bonding questionnaires: a comparison of the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale with the Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire in a sample of primiparous mothers. Arch Womens Ment Health. 2007;10(4):171-5.

Wittkowski A, Vatter S, Muhinyi A, Garrett C, Henderson M. Measureing bonding or attachment in the aprent-infant-relationship: A systematic review of parent-report assessment measures, their psychometric properties and clinical utility. Clin Psychol Rev. 2020;82:101906.

Luyten P, Mayes LC, Nijssens L, Fonagy P. The parental reflective functioning questionnaire: development and preliminary validation. PloS One. 2017;12(5):e0176218.

Fonagy P, Luyten P, Moulton-Perkins A, Lee Y, Warren F, Howard S, et al. Development and validation of a self-report measure of mentalizing: The reflective functioning questionnaire. PloS One 2016;11(7):e0158678.

Anis L, Perez G, Benzies KM, Ewashen C, Hart M, Letourneau N. Convergent validity of three measures of reflective function: Parent Development Interview, Parental Reflective Function Questionnaire, and Reflective Function Questionnaire. Front Psychol. 2020;11:574719.

Evans C, Connell J, Barkham M, Marigson F, McGracth G, Mellor-Clark J, et al. Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: psychometric properties and utility. Br J Psychiatry. 2002;180:51-60.

Connell J, Barkham M, Stiles WB, Twigg E, Singleton NA, Evans O, et al. Distribution of CORE-OM scores in a general population, clinical cut-off points and comparison with the CIS-R. Br J Psychiatry. 2007:190;69-74.

Whitehead AL, Julious SA, Cooper CL, Campbell MJ. Estimating the sample size for a pilot randomised trial to minimise the overall trial sample size for the external pilot and main trial for a continuous outcome variable. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016;25(3):1057-73.

Higgins JPT, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Sterne JAC. In Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial. Higgins J, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, et al. eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.3. 2022. Cochrane. Available at: www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed on 28 March 2024.

Tripepi G, Chesnaye NC, Dekker FW, Zoccali C, Jager KJ. Intention to treat and pre protocol anaylsis in clinical trials. Nephrology. 2020;25(7):513-7.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-25