Clinical trials of anticoagulation in COVID-19: a systematic review

Authors

  • Olivia Tracey College of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York
  • Srinath Ramaswamy Department of Neurology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York
  • Steven R. Levine College of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA Department of Neurology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA Department of Emergency Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA Department of Neurology, Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA Comprehensive Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20210146

Keywords:

COVID-19, SARS-CoV2, Arterial thromboembolism, Stroke, Hemorrhage, Antithrombotic therapy

Abstract

A high prevalence of thrombotic events is observed in coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19). Optimal anticoagulation becomes a critical part of treatment and higher-dose prophylactic anticoagulation is being practiced. Prospective evidence to confirm the safety and efficacy of these regimens is lacking. We performed a systematic review of existing studies of anticoagulation in COVID-19. The ClinicalTrials.gov registry, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT) were searched from inception to September 1, 2020. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Qualitative and quantitative analysis were performed. We identified 36 clinical studies involving anticoagulation in COVID-19. Most common study location was the United States (n=12, 33%). Thirty studies were randomized-controlled (83%) of which 22 were open-label. Median sample size was 309 (IQR 139-952) and study duration was 233 days (IQR 174-357). Most common study setting was critical and non-critical care (n=21, 58%). Most common single primary outcome was all-cause mortality (n=15, 42%) but thrombotic events represent the overall most common primary outcome (n=28, 77%). Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) was the most common agent studied (n=25, 69%) followed by unfractionated heparin (UFH) (n=14, 38.8%) and factor Xa antagonists (n=8, 22.2%). Therapeutic-intensity prophylaxis was the most common dosage regimen studied in comparison to routine thromboprophylaxis dose in 76% and 86% of studies with LMWH and UFH respectively. Five studies (14%) used intermediate-dose prophylaxis. Bleeding is studied as an outcome variable in 19 studies (53%). Our review identifies studies of anticoagulation in COVID-19 and the pharmacological agents used, dosage intensities, and the outcomes analyzed.

 

Author Biographies

Srinath Ramaswamy, Department of Neurology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York

Resident physician

Steven R. Levine, College of Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA Department of Neurology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA Department of Emergency Medicine, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, USA Department of Neurology, Kings County Hospital Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA Comprehensive Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA

Distinguished Professor

References

Coronavirus resource center, Johns Hopkins University and Medicine. Updated September 7, 2020. https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/. Last accessed on 7th September, 2020.

Ye Q, Wang B, Mao J. The pathogenesis and treatment of the `Cytokine Storm' in COVID-19. J Infect. 2020;80(6):607-13.

Zhang W, Zhao Y, Zhang F, Wang Q, Li T, et al. The use of anti-inflammatory drugs in the treatment of people with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): The Perspectives of clinical immunologists from China. Clin Immunol. 2020;214:108393.

Zhang L, Feng X, Zhang D, Jiang C, Mei H, Wang J et al. Deep vein thrombosis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: prevalence, risk factors, and outcome. Circulation. 2020;142:114-28.

Ren B, Yan F, Deng Z, Zhang S, Xiao L, Wu M, et al. Extremely high incidence of lower extremity deep venous thrombosis in 48 patients with severe COVID-19 in Wuhan. Circulation. 2020;142:181-83.

Helms J, Tacquard C, Severac F, Leonard-Lorant I, Ohana M, Delabranche X, et al. High risk of thrombosis in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multicenter prospective cohort study.Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:1089-98.

Marietta M, Ageno W, Artoni A, Candia ED, Gresele P, Marchetti M, et al. COVID-19 and haemostasis: a position paper from Italian Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (SISET). Blood Transfus. 2020;18(3):167-169.

Vivas D, Roldán V, Esteve-Pastor MA, Roldan I, Tello-Montoliu A, Ruiz-Nodar, et al. Recommendations on antithrombotic treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Position statement of the Working Group on Cardiovascular Thrombosis of the Spanish Society of Cardiology. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2020;10.1016/ j.recesp.2020.04.006.

Casini A, Alberio L, Angelillo-Scherrer A, Fontana P, Gerber B, Graf L, et al. Thromboprophylaxis and laboratory monitoring for in-hospital patients with COVID-19 - a Swiss consensus statement by the Working Party Hemostasis. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20247.

Terpos E, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Elalamy I, Kastritis E, Sergentanis TN, et al. Hematological findings and complications of COVID-19. Am J Hematol. 2020;95(7):834-47.

Bikdeli B, Madhavan MV, Jimenez D, Chuich T, Dreyfus I, Driggin E, et al. COVID-19 and Thrombotic or Thromboembolic Disease: Implications for Prevention, Antithrombotic Therapy, and Follow-Up: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(23):2950-973.

Thachil J, Tang N, Gando S, Falanga A, Cattaneo A, Levi M, et al. ISTH interim guidance on recognition and management of coagulopathy in COVID‐19. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18:1023-1026.

Levi M, Thachil J, Iba T, Levy JH. Coagulation abnormalities and thrombosis in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7(6):e438-e440.

Moores LK, Tritschler T, Brosnahan S, Carrier M Collen JF, Doerchung K, et al. Prevention, diagnosis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2020;S0012-3692(20)31625-1.

Zhai Z, Li C, Chen Y, Gerotziafas G, Zhang Z, Wan J, et al. Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection: A Consensus Statement before Guidelines. Thromb Haemost. 2020;120(6):937-948.

Xu S, Li Y. Beware of the second wave of COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;395(10233):1321-1322.

WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard, World Health Organization. Updated Sep 7, 2020. https://covid19.who.int/. Last accessed on 7th September, 2020.

Hirsh J. Low-molecular-weight heparin: A review of the results of recent studies of the treatment of venous thromboembolism and unstable angina. Circulation. 1998;98(15):1575-1582.

Testa S, Prandoni P, Paoletti O, Morandini R, Tala M, Dellanoce C, et al. Direct oral anticoagulant plasma levels' striking increase in severe COVID-19 respiratory syndrome patients treated with antiviral agents: The Cremona experience. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;18(6):1320-1323.

Iba T, Levy JH, Levi M, Thachil J. Coagulopathy in COVID-19. J Thromb Haemost. 2020;10.1111/jth.14975.

PROTECT Investigators for the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group and the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group, Cook D, Meade M, et al. Dalteparin versus unfractionated heparin in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(14):1305-14.

Benger M, Williams O, Siddiqui J, Sztriha L. Intracerebral haemorrhage and COVID-19: Clinical characteristics from a case series. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;88:940-944.

Jain R, Young M, Dogra S, Kennedy H, Nguyen V, Jones S, et al. COVID-19 related neuroimaging findings: A signal of thromboembolic complications and a strong prognostic marker of poor patient outcome. J Neurol Sci. 2020;414:116923.

Bauchner H, Fontanarosa PB. Randomized Clinical Trials and COVID-19: Managing Expectations. JAMA. 2020;10.1001/jama.2020.8115.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-22

Issue

Section

Systematic Reviews