Functional outcome of minimally invasive posterior stabilisation in dorsal and lumbar spine fractures
Background: Minimally invasive spinal surgery will be a highlight of operative approaches in the twenty-first century and already has been popularized worldwide. This procedure will provide surgical options that address several pathological conditions in the spinal column without producing the types of morbidity commonly seen in open surgical procedures. The objective was to assess the outcomes of minimally invasive posterior stabilization of dorsal and lumbar spine fractures.
Methods: This was a prospective study of twenty patients with dorsal or lumbar fractures who were admitted at Sri Ramachandra University. All patients having dorsal and lumbar spinal fractures with intact neurology were included in the study. All the patients underwent minimally invasive posterior stabilization by freehand technique. Functional outcomes were measured by VAS scale, ASIA scoring (neurology), and their ability to mobilize.
Results: The average duration of surgery was 85.50 minutes. The average blood loss in our study group was 77 ml. The average operation to mobilization time was 2.2 days. The average post-operative Cobb’s angle was 0.6 degree of kyphosis. The average post-operative gain was 12 degree.Conclusion: Minimally invasive percutaneous stabilization of the spine helps to minimize approach related morbidity and secondary iatrogenic soft tissue trauma. It enables early mobilization, which contributes to improved outcome.
Dewald RL. Burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Clin Orthop. 1984;189:150-61.
Heyde CE, Ertel W, Kayser R. Management of spine injuries in polytraumatized patients. Orthop. 2005 Sep;34(9):889-905.
Levin PE. Fractures, dislocations, ligamentous injuries. In: Browner BD, Jupiter JB, Levine AM, Trafton PG, eds. Skeletal Trauma. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co; 1998: 841-842, 947-1027.
Ringel F, Stoffel M et al. minimally invasive transmuscular pedicle screw fixation of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Neurosurg. 2006;59:361-7.
Wood K, Butterman A et al. Operative compared with non-operative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:773-81.
Li-Yang Dai, Lei-Sheng Jiang et al Posterior Short-Segment Fixation with or without fusion for thoracolumbar burst fractures. A five to seven-year prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:1033-41.
Rex AW, Marco et al. Thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with posterior decompression and pedicle screw. J Bone Joint Surg. 2009 Jan;91A(1):20-8.
Wild MH, Glees M, Plieschnegger C, Wenda K. Five-year follow-up examination after purely minimally invasive posterior stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures: a comparison of minimally invasive percutaneously and conventionally open treated patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:335-43.
Oliver I Schmidt, Sergej Strasser et al. Role of early minimal-invasive spine fixation in acute thoracic and lumbar spine trauma. Indian J Orthop. 2007 Oct-Dec;41(4):374-80.
Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery part 2: histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. Spine. 1994;19:2598-602.
Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: a histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine. 1996;21:941-4.
John E. O'Toole, Kurt M. Eichholz. Surgical site infection rates after minimally invasive spinal surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2009 Oct;11(4):471-6.
Kim DY, Lee SH, Chung SK, Lee HY. Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy and trunk extension muscle strength: Percutaneous versus open pedicle screw fixation. Spine. 2005;30:123-9.
Assaker R. The use of minimal access spinal techniques for the management of thoracolumbar trauma. In: Assaker R, eds. Eurospine. Spain: Barcelona; 2005.