Randomized two dimensional between patient response surface pathway design with two interventional and one response variable in estimating minimum efficacy dose

Authors

  • Stig Larsen Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Norwegian University of Life Science, Oslo, Norway
  • Trond Holand Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Norwegian University of Life Science, Oslo, Norway
  • Kjell Bjørnæs Department of Osteopathy, JointMed, Hønengata 6, 3513 Hønefoss, Norway
  • Espen Glomsrød Department of Osteopathy, JointMed, Hønengata 6, 3513 Hønefoss, Norway
  • Joachim Kaufmann Department of Osteopathy, JointMed, Hønengata 6, 3513 Hønefoss, Norway
  • Tor Harald Garberg Department of Osteopathy, JointMed, Hønengata 6, 3513 Hønefoss, Norway
  • Geir Elvbakken Department of Osteopathy, JointMed, Hønengata 6, 3513 Hønefoss, Norway
  • Bård Dalhøi Department of Osteopathy, JointMed, Hønengata 6, 3513 Hønefoss, Norway
  • Ola Reiertsen Department of Digestive Surgery, Akershus University Hospital and University of Oslo, Campus Ahus, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway
  • Sagita Dewi Department of Production Animal Clinical Sciences, Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Norwegian University of Life Science, Oslo, Norway; Research department, Bali Mandara Eye Hospital, Bali, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20193210

Keywords:

Two-dimensional randomized response surface pathway design, RSP, Osteopathic manual therapy, OMT in treatment of GERD, Dose-response

Abstract

Background: The aim of this paper is to introduce and evaluate the RSP design with two interventional and one response variable exemplified by estimating minimum efficacy dose (MED) of osteopathic manual therapy (OMT) in treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

Methods: 15 GERD patients, divided in three design-level with three, five and seven patients. The study was performed as a randomized two-dimensional, between-patient RSP designed multicenter study with two interventional– and one response variable. The interventional variables “Number of OMT’s” and “Treatment Interval” with common response variable, formed two independent one-dimensional randomized between-patient RSP studies. The response variable was percent reduction in sum of the five GERD score from baseline. Three GERD patients were allocated on the first design level and given six OMT with five days’ interval. Based on results obtained in the first and second design level, five patients were included to the second design level and seven to the third.

Results: The two-dimensional randomized between-patient RSP-design with the combined outcome procedure worked as expected. The percent reduction in GERD score increased with increasing number of OMT’s and time intervals. This increase leveled out after three to five OMT’s and three to four days between treatments. A clinical interaction between the two interventional variables was obtained. The estimated MED of OMT in treatment of GERD was three treatments with two days between treatments.

Conclusions: The suggested two-dimensional, randomized between-patient RSP-design worked as expected and estimated MED of OMT in GERD patient sufficiently.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

van Pinxteren B, Numans ME, Lau J, de Wit NJ, Pali A, Hungin S, et al. Short-term treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(9):755–63.

Cheskin LJ, Lacy BE. Healing Heartburn. 1st edition. Baltimore, London: John Hopkins University Press; 2002: 50-52.

Nissen LM. Fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: long-term results. Ann Chir Gynaecology. 1995;84(2):115-20.

Still AT. Philosophy of Osteopathy. Indianapolis. 7th edition. Am Acad Osteopathy. 1955: 16.

da Silva RCV, de Sá CC, Pascual-Vaca ÁO, de Souza Fontes LH, Herbella Fernandes FA, Dib RA, et al. Increasing of lower Esophageal sphincter pressure after osteopathic intervention on the diaphragm in patients with gastro esophageal reflux. Dis Esophagus. 2013;26(5):451–6.

Bjørnæs KE, Reiertsen O, Larsen S. Does Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) have an effect in the treatment of patients suffering from Gastro Oesophageal Reflux Disease (GORD)? Int J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2016;1:116.

Bjørnæs KE, Larsen S, Fosse E, Myklebust Ø, Skauvik T, Reiertsen O. The effect of Osteopathic Manipulation Therapy (OMT) in patients suffering from Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD). Int J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2017;2.

Hulley SB, Cummings SR, Browner SW, Grady DG, Newman TB. Designing Clinical Research‬. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013: ISBN: 9781608318049.

Saccà L. The uncontrolled clinical trial: scientific, ethical, and practical reasons for being. Intern Emerg Med. 2010;5(3):201-4.

Ryeng KA, Arnemo JM, Larsen S. Determination of optimal immobilizing doses of medetomidine-ketamine in captive reindeer (Rangifer tarandus tarandus). An iteration-designed controlled clinical study in wildlife medicine. Am J Vet Res. 2001;62:119–26.

Dewi S, Aune T, Buanæs JAA, Smith AJ, Larsen S. The development of response surface pathway design to reduce animal numbers in toxicity studies. BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology. 2014;15:18.

Dewi S, Larsen S, Srimuninnimit V, Lu Y, Manuaba T, Lindkær-Jensen S. Benzene-poly-carboxylic acids complex with cis-diamminepolatinum (II) dichloride in the treatment of stage IV breast cancer patients. The Open Breast Cancer J. 2013;5:7–15.

Kristiansen VM, Dewi S, Horsberg TE, Jonasdottir JT, Moe L, Berlinger B, et al. Tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile of a novel benzene-poly-carboxylic acids complex with cis-diammineplatinum (II) dichloride in dogs with malignant mammary tumours. Vet Comp Oncol. 2017;15(1):118-32.

Dewi S, Kristiansen VM, Lindkær-Jensen S, Larsen S. Between- and within-patient, n-level Response Surface Pathway Design in dose-finding studies. Open Access J Clin Trials. 2014;6;63–74.

Holand T, Ellingsen K, Dewi S, Larsen S. Randomized Response Surface Pathway design with odd response outcomes in a Latin Square designed study. Open Access J Clin Trials. 2017;9:75–84.

Holand T, Dewi S, Larsen S. Development of a randomized two-dimensional Response Surface Pathway design with two interventional- and one response variable. Open Access J Clin Trials. 2016;8:33–42.

Vakil N, van Zanten SV, Kahrilas P, Dent J, Jones R. Global consensus group. The Montreal definition and classification of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a global evidence-based consensus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(8):1900-20.

Sami SS, Raghunath K. The Los Angeles Classification of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Video Journal and Encyclopedia of Endoscopy. 2013;1(1):103-4.

Fisher G. Series and Sequences. Phoenix Education: Putney; 1996.

Paul RK, Rosenberger WF, Flournoy N. Quantile estimation following non-parametric phase I clinical trials with ordinal response. Stat Med. 2004;23:2483-95.

Stylianou M. Advanced in and Limitations of Up-and-down Methodology: A Precis of Clinical Use, Study Design and Dose Estimation in Anesthesia Research. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:144-52.

Stylianou M. Dose finding using the biased coin up-and-down design and isotonic regression. Biometrics. 2002;58:171–7.

Altman DG. Practical Statistic for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall. 1991.

Glomsrød E, Larsen S, Jensen R. Osteopathic treatment in patients suffering from long-lasting unspecific low back pain: A dose- response study. Int J Clin Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2016;1:115–9.

Kaufmann J, Larsen S. How do the number and the duration between osteopathic treatments influence the effect on patients suffering from foot-related pain? A dose-response study. Bio Core IJPSR. 2016;2:209–16.

Downloads

Published

2019-07-24

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles